Here\u2019s a short article about the class<\/a>.) BCORE 120 Discovery Core: \u201cThe Cultural Studies of Graphic Memoir\u201d BWRIT 134 Composition: \u201cReadin\u2019, Writin\u2019, and Stereotypin\u2019\u201d BWRIT 135 Research Writing BLEAD 103 People Skills: \u201cPower, Sociality, and Ethical Leadership Skills\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\nResearch\/Scholarship<\/h2>\n\n\n\n My research informs heavily my commitment to engaging students in cultural analysis as a way to learn to build arguments and understand their social world. I earned my PhD from the University of Washington. While there, I also was a Public Scholar fellow and was also part of two collaborative research collectives through the Simpson Center for the Humanities that informed my research and thinking. The Race\/Knowledge Project explored the relationship between cultural work and the neoliberal university for understanding race and racialization while Queer Worlds focused on the way that queer scholarship shifts as it becomes institutionalized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
My book project Promiscuous Contexts: Race, Sex, Gender and the Problem of the Stereotype in the Politics of Representation<\/em><\/strong> examines the persistence of the sexual and racial stereotyping of African Americans in the United States since Reconstruction. Specifically, I am interested in the problem of the stereotype, including how they are able to affix essentialist, ahistorical identities onto their subjects while also being able to adapt to changing social attitudes in ways that make them appear perpetually current. For instance, I engage the Jezebel and the Black Buck stereotypes to show how they continue to frame social relations and legitimize racial violence into our present in part by evolving into stereotypes such as the Welfare Queen and the Criminal. I argue this longevity is due to a resistance to critique that stems from the way that past and current social scientific discourse has defined the stereotype as a rectifiable misrepresentation and that this hegemonic account of the stereotype has resulted in misreadings that have foreclosed the complex critical insights about how stereotypes work that many cultural texts may provide.<\/p>\n\n\n\nMy scholarship intervenes in what I call the \u201ccorrective fallacy\u201d of stereotyping apparent in a wide variety of scholarship, social movement discourse, and literary, popular, and other cultural texts. These accounts continue to rely on Walter Lippman\u2019s early social psychological rendering of stereotypes as false \u201cpreconceptions\u201d able to be corrected given enough \u201ctrue\u201d information. These corrective models defines the stereotype as a problem of individual mindsets rather than as a tactic of institutional and systemic power. This approach remains relatively unquestioned in the current quantitative scholarship that once again psychologizes the idea of the stereotype by its effects (stereotype threat) or impulses (implicit bias or microaggressive behavior) and focuses on \u201ccorrecting\u201d the mindset of either victims or perpetrators. Other scholarship that focuses on the transgressive possibilities of the stereotype\u2019s \u201cproductive ambivalence\u201d also remains invested in the idea that the effects of stereotyping can be changed through critical re-presentation. I contend that this fallacy has framed much of our understanding of stereotypes, including our reading practices of texts that represent them. Against the grain of this corrective discourse, my project offers a schematic I discern in the work of Francis E.W. Harper, Ida B. Wells, Richard Wright, James Baldwin and others that I call, after Kobena Mercer, \u201cpromiscuous contexts.\u201d While much of the scholarship on these authors analyzes the \u201ctruth\u201d they reveal behind a particular stereotype, I draw on women of color feminism, queer of color critique, and the cultural studies of representation to argue these texts offer radical contextualizations that reveal the stereotype as a form of promiscuous power that works most effectively through its multiple relations with other stereotypes within multiple structures of power, desire, and identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Educational Leadership<\/h2>\n\n\n\n I am or was part of several initiatives on the UWB campus that engage pedagogical and curricular concerns, including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nEquity Across the Curriculum Initiative Team Member: <\/strong>I am a member of the inaugural team tasked with engaging the ways that faculty and staff can work toward a more inclusive curriculum for students at UWB. The group is creating workshops and materials to aid in the adoption of more inclusive, critical, and trauma-informed pedagogy, UDL, and accessibility protocols, as well as ways to support faculty and staff at every level of this development and\/or implementation.<\/li>\n\n\n\nCAWG\/FYPP Participation: <\/strong>I am a part of American and Ethnic Studies; Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies; Culture, Literature, and the Arts, and the Rhetoric and Composition CAWGs as well as an active participant in conversations about FYPP pedagogy.<\/li>\n\n\n\nBWRIT 135: Research Writing Working Group: <\/strong>Since I was invited by the Director of Composition in 2019, I have been part of a group thinking about ways to develop hybrid and distance learning options for Research Writing courses.<\/li>\n\n\n\nTechnology Teaching Fellows Institute: <\/strong>During the summer of 2020, I was a part of a week-long conference\/program focused on best practices for developing fully online classes.<\/li>\n\n\n\nWriting Pedagogy Fellowship: <\/strong>During the AY 2019-2020, I was a member of the inaugural group of writing teachers from different disciplines across UWB that discussed ways to support each other and develop the writing curriculum across campus.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nSelected Publications<\/h2>\n\n\n\n I am currently working on a book project (which is increasingly obvious is actually two) that investigates the ways that late 19th and early 20th century African American literature and cultural work have theorized hypersexual stereotypes, including how the cultural texts of Wells, Wright, and Baldwin engage the \u201cBlack Buck\u201d\/\u201cBlack Rapist\u201d stereotype and how Harper, Pauline Hopkins, Jessie Fauset, and Toni Morrison engage the \u201cJezebel\u201d and other forms of the hypersexual Black woman. Part of this work involves analyzing how both media portrayals of young men of color like Michael Brown as criminal \u201cdemons\u201d and the counter-discourse working against those portrayals relies on the corrective theory of stereotyping, which forms the basis of an undergraduate research mentorship project at UW.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Lecturer B.A. English, Creative Writing Concentration, University of MaineM.A. English Language and Literature, University of WashingtonPh.D. English Language and Literature, University of Washington Office: UW1-391Email: jhmorse@uw.edu Intro My research takes an interdisciplinary and intersectional approach to the cultural studies of sexuality as a form of gendered racial power, including especially the way that stereotypes work…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":1254,"menu_order":75,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-19684","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Jason Morse (he\/they) - School of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n\t \n